GUN CONTROL IN THE UNITED STATES

GUN CONTROL IN THE UNITED STATES

GUN CONTROL IN THE UNITED STATES

Introduction:

The Argument is based on whether the guns should be prohibited for the citizens. In the opposing argument, prohibiting the guns for the use of citizens might increase the crime rate as criminals do have guns whether illegal or legal. U.S government believes in giving its citizens the full liberty, right to protect and happiness. In order to protect the rights given to the citizens, indeed in order to survive, every individual has the right to protect himself, his family and his property by any means necessary. U.S allowed the full freedom to its citizens to have guns for their self defense. At this stage the question a rises that won't the use of guns legally become mayhem or would generate any confusion? Or would create the situation better? People consider guns as the most harmful thing. Adding the supporting point, the use of guns should be prohibited because it truly depends on the person's tolerance level. Hundreds of children die because of considering guns as a toy kept in their homes as they are not aware of the aftereffects (Lott, 2005). The more the addition of guns in the country the more would be the fear of people getting seriously hurt, injured or maybe killed. If only criminal had guns it should become easier to recognize the criminals which would help crime by deterrence.

In 98 percent of the cases of gun defenses, no shot has been for fired by the civilians as the robbers are the professional users of guns and using the gun in self defense would be more risky for the civilian as if the robber sees the civilian with the gun, it would end up in murdering of the civilian. A ...