GOD VERSUS EVOLUTION

God versus Darwin theory

God versus Darwin theory

Introduction

The question of our origin is probably one of the oldest and most controversial issues in the entire history of science has been facing. Is man only a written creation greater than in the religious books, or is man merely another creature that has developed its nature? One of the main themes for this dilemma is the limitation that exists in our universe to be in a position either to measure one of these theories because of insufficient skills or to validate them to explain.

Discussion

Various religions have offered various explanations, and had internal conflicts, which have not recognized as one single declaration to absolute and complete. Those who believe in evolutionary theory say that the first life emerged four or five billion years ago as a result of billions of years of accidental nuclear random religion. The second theory is that creationism as God created life. Compares our fundamental laws of science are meaningless if the two different explanations to so many inconsistencies that seem to have, people are then able to offer the question, what explanation reasonable and valid answer to the origin of life face.

In this paper, the team will attempt an approach to evolution versus creationism and some of the reasons why address a stalemate between the two theories. The team will also be a real life example that for legitimate arguments for both theories make and shows how the example of the religious industry concerns and the scientific industry.

Science is a kind of knowledge, one based on the request. Scientists have always had a thirst for knowledge and many have spent their life trying to explain and find answers to by two different approaches: discovery science and hypothesis-driven science. Today, most researchers use a combination of these two approaches as the first method can be somewhat limited, but it is understandable that the science is nothing without the scientific method. This method can lead to Galileo Galilei, an Italian scientist of the 1500s, of every faith in the time by this method much by repeated attempts, the other could then be traced refuted to reproduce and understand. But what is really a scientific method? It may be an approach for finding knowledge in science is determined by experiments, observations and collection of information, which basically means the condition? Answers, one looks for the facts, and that can be repeated and reproduced by anyone. This brings us to the most important steps of the scientific method: observation, formulation of hypothesis, experiment and conclusion. All these steps are essential to validate for a research project, and without it the results are useless(Campbell, 2007).

A good example of how the scientific method works just like find out why a computer shuts off suddenly. The hypothesis could be that perhaps was the closure, or maybe a chord unplugged by accident, or perhaps no longer just the computer works. By observation of the phenomenon, and experiments as possible, trying the case ...