Feedback

Feedback

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to expand the boundaries of our knowledge by examining different aspects in two articles that are specifically related to terrorism. The first article in written and composed by Curtis Rasmussen, the other article is articulated by Megan Smith. In this paper we will provide two feed backs for the two papers attached.

Feedback

Name of the writer: Curtis Rasmussen

Feedback-1

The article is well written; still it could have been made much better if the writer had focused on some key points i.e. conducting more in depth research on the topic of terrorism, focus on formatting and compliance of the paper etc. First, I would like to examine the formatting of the article. Whenever you write an article, it should be written by following some format, i.e. APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard etc (Frantzen, 1987).

In this article, the writer does not seem to have followed any particular format, which makes the article looks informal (Ferris, 2000). Secondly, the presentation of the article is also disordered. The author did not put any headings in the paper; in order to make the paper more presentable and readable; each paragraph should have been discussed under some heading. For instance, a general outline of the paper includes an introductory paragraph, where the writer orients the reader about the problem and the aspects that will be covered later in the article (Ellis, 1998). The introductory paragraph also contains a thesis statement, in which the writer clearly specifies the problem to be researched in the article (Chaney, 1999). Once the introductory paragraph is written, the author writes the body of the paper, under the heading of discussion and analysis (Chandler, 2003).

Finally, the author summarizes the article under the heading of conclusion. Whereas, in this article by Curtis Rasmussen, the writer does not seem to ...