Many Reformed folks have been educated that the ontological verification for God's reality is absolutely useless for apologetics. This concept is generally endorsed up by the contention that Anselm was a rationalist who considered he could verify God just by considering actually hard. But, is that not a bit anachronistic? Was Anselm Descartes? Did he start from untainted cause exception from any conviction in the Christian God? Was his a firm natural theology? Anselm's ontological contention is not Natural Theology in the Enlightenment sense. He does, nonetheless, request to illustrate the reality of God founded on an ...