Since the beginning of civilization people justify their existence and properties of the nature of the reality of higher powers. Religion was used as a promise to the masses, moral leadership, and most of the sects, the guarantee of a future life is better than we live. Today, the vast majority of the world's population believes in God, and while these gods differ in some respects, more similar than different. There are three main arguments for the existence of God's monotheistic religions. Aquinas popularized the cosmological argument, which says that every creature that exists in the world of contingent, or dependent. It has been stated by ontological argument that the most conceivable being is GOD. The concluding argument called the teleological argument suggest that one of the most complex system is nature and the working of nature is very disciplined and this system is called teleological system. It has been said that all systems are people created and the teleological system is included in it as well. Hence it is said that the GOD has intelligence like humans.
These arguments have some similarities, but this essay will focus on how the teleological argument is the ontological and cosmological arguments are fundamentally different from the symptoms of the existence of God and the fact that patients have had previous similar symptoms. Teleological argument compares the world with other complex systems that humans have created. Both cosmological and the ontological argument, a priori, it means that you can see from the comments. It's a big difference in principle as the teleological argument is based on the evidence of the existence of God, and the cosmological and ontological arguments are based on the fact that the faithful believe the proofs.
The teleological argument only argues that the existence of God, or an author of ...