“Is European Energy Law compatible with the basic tenets of the European Economic Constitution?”
Table of Contents
Chapter I: Introduction3
The reasons I am pursuing this area of law3
Chapter II: Literature Review3
The European Economic Constitution3
An “ever closer union”3
The Treaty of Rome and challenges of the EU3
Significant Articles of the Treaty of Lisbon3
The Energy Crisis3
Chapter III: Discussion3
Competition Law and Policy to tackle the energy crisis3
De-regulation3
The “free” market3
Chapter IV: Analysis3
The Limitation of Markets3
The Pricing of Energy3
Concentration of power in the energy sector is dangerous: OPEC3
Oligopolistic nature of the energy market3
The Four Freedoms3
The Free Movement of Goods3
Energy dependence3
Transmission3
State Aid3
Government controls the framework in which markets operate:3
National Oil Companies3
The French Government3
Dieter Helm3
Structural Funds3
Mergers3
Article 102 (Lisbon Treaty); abuse of a dominant position3
The Commission3
Monopolies3
Chapter V: Conclusion3
The effects on the environment3
Free movement of goods in relation to transmission of gas3
Externalities3
Undertakings3
Conclusion i.e. what should be done to improve the current situation?3
References3
Footnotes3
Notes3
Bibliography3
“Is European Energy Law compatible with the basic tenets of the European Economic Constitution?”
Chapter I: Introduction
The reasons I am pursuing this area of law
“However, the economic order of the Community is that of a market system, essentially based upon the concept, and process, of competition. Individual rights are guaranteed, but certain limits can be set on the exercise of these rights in the light of the public interest. The EC Treaty allocates competition as a principle goal of the Internal Market, with Article 3 EC creating a picture of “an internal market characterised, as between MS, of obstacles to the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital” and “a system ensuring that competition in the Internal Market is not distorted”. This is to take place within the context provided by Article 4 EC of “an open market economy with free competition”. The Court has subsequently elevated competition into one of the fundamental principles of the Economic Constitution”.
The EU is a political animal - an “unruly horse”- whose economic harnesses have prevented it from losing control; it ultimately seeks to make money, and therefore caters, first and foremost, for the political interests of the Member States. I do not think the EU is truly “economic” in nature; it seeks to emanate the centralisation of power. We see this happening because the Lisbon Treaty talks in economic terms but the EU acts politically. These are the underlying assumptions of the Lisbon Treaty. We see this in the competition provisions of the Treaty which favours economic liberalisation over capitalism and Governmental intervention in the market.
Reliable and continuous supply of both electricity and gas at reasonable prices is an essential public service. In fact at present, the level of economic and social development, which has been achieved in the EU causes energy, especially electricity to be a public good, pertained to everyone, without differentiation on material status. Paradoxically, energy is also considered to be a commodity in the case law of the European Court of Justice,2 and as such, its price should be determined by supply and demand (Jamasb and Pollitt, 2005; Joskow, 2006a; Nowak, 2009a), not by non-market factors such as ...