ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Environmental Issues

Environmental Issues

Introduction

Overhearing a dialogue concerning a possibly shameful and illicit act in relation to public security, one is put into an inapt situation of making hard alternatives directly influencing safety and livelihood of numerous individuals. It is of utmost significance to address both the immediate and long period ramifications of any action you may take in such a precarious situation. In the position of overhearing the Vice President of Production inquire the environmental advisor recommendations on how to get rid of toxic waste into a retaining pond, it becomes clear-cut there are both municipal and lawless person matters to consider. Reaching the befitting decision of what activity to take is not an very simple decision.

Environmental ethical and social dilemma

Environmental ethics relies very strongly on the business's firm pledge to minimizing ecological harm. As the aide to the Vice leader (VP) you have an ethical obligation to your overseer, the business, and the community. As an worker, you should decide how to handle the data you overhear the Vice leader discussing with the companies ecological consultant.

Breaches in ethics regarding the dialogue you overhear alter in severity. The first issue to consider would be if or not what you overhear the VP and consultant talk about is fact or hearsay. The dialogue between the Vice leader and advisor considering dumping into the retaining pond has the potential to origin the natural natural environment harm. There are fundamentally two ways to handle the dialogue overheard.

As an worker you should decide if to proceed internally with the data you overheard. Should you proceed to the President of the company? You risk the detail that the leader may be fully aware of the dialogue between the Vice leader and the consultant. If you seem this may be the case, you should address whistleblowing.

Going straight to the appropriate state or government agency with the data you have heard. As an worker you could face the lawful ramifications if your company violates any State or Federal actions to protect the environment. As a whistleblower you would most likely be defended from municipal liability should the business present an illegal activity.

The break in ethics would be if or not to covey the data internally or externally. If the data is not issued internally to the President the business could suffer serious consequences. Likewise, if the information is not issued to a State or government bureau, then you as well as the company will be lawfully penalized in a municipal suit if the company presents any illicit action.

Strict guidelines have been established for management of compounds identified as toxic under the National ecological principle proceed and state ecological acts. These actions have apparently defined principle on output, management, transport, and disposal of such substances. Unauthorized disposal of recognised compounds by a senior corporate employee would most expected be classified as knowingly violating these acts and such activities convey defined lawless person penalties. Any worker having information of the act takes the risk of lawless person ...