In many countries, attempts to curtail escalating costs of
acute inpatient care have resulted in pressures to reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) and transfer the responsibility for continuation of care to services in the community. Planning
hospital discharge has become an increasingly critical activity
that aims to achieve a smooth transition of patients to
continuing care serviceswherever possible, avoiding unnecessary
delays and discontinuities in their care while containing costs
and improving outcomes once the patient is at home (Caplan, 2004,
1423).
In most places, discharge planning has traditionally been
part of the social work domain; social workers work together with patients, families, and staff to develop specific discharge
plans to the home or to another institution. In the atmosphere
of cost-containment, social work research has also focused on
outcomes of discharge planning in terms of LOS and readmissions.
Other outcomes evaluated include satisfaction of patients and
families with services implemented postdischarge and their
adequacy in meeting patients' needs Less attention has been
paid to evaluating the process of discharge planning, that is,
clients' assessment of their involvement in the discharge
planning process during hospitalization, and their evaluation of
adequacy of those plans at the time of discharge. The purpose of
the current study was to examine the adequacy of discharge
plans developed for hospitalized patients and to expand the
understanding of factors related to the adequacy of these plans
as assessed by the patients or family. It is a part of a
comprehensive research examining continuity of care for
hospitalized patients seen by hospital social work services in
U.K. (Chiu, 2007, 336 ).
Literature Review
Discharge planning has been defined as ''a systematic, organized and centralized approach to providing continuity of care from the time a patient is admitted to a health care facility through return to the community'. In U.K., social workers do most of the discharge planning in acute care hospitals, screening for high-risk patients and intervening with those referred by staff members, particularly complex cases. Components of the process of discharge planning practice have been described and evaluated by social workers in various countries as well as in U.K.
These practice activities include (Counsell, 2006, 1141):
(a) early identification and assessment of patients likely to require services;
(b) coordinating the multidisciplinary health care team's discharge-related activities;
(c) identifying and coordinating resources necessary for posthospital care;
(d) providing information to patients and families to assist them in selecting and applying for services; and (e) follow-up of discharged patients.
Discharge planners' time is spent mainly on assessment and coordination, while follow-up is rarely a routine practice activity. Studies that examine how these activities are perceived by clients and family members are thus essential for providing feedback to social workers. Discharge planning is guided by social work practice principles and values. These values, as articulated in the Social Work Code of Ethics U.K., emphasize social workers' obligation to provide the clients with full information about available services, to ...