DISTANCE LEARNING

The Controversy Of Distance Learning

The Controversy Of Distance Learning

Introduction

It was just actually nice to discover that there is a evolving alternate method accessible for persons to avail of education even out-of-doors the school premises. It was interesting to witness that the world has really been on its pathway in the direction of globalization and progress. I agree that technological advancement is one of the most evident verifications for nearly everyone. I believe that the growth of distant education is on its way to being widely acknowledged via both pupils and teachers because of its underlying and detectable advantages for parties (students and teachers), the federal and the commerce sector. My stand is that distant learning, online learning, or interactive learning, anything any person prefers, as an alternate method of knowledge acquisition will not and should not restore traditional school room education even if it be an suggestion of the world's progress. (Holzberg 1995)

Discussion and Analysis

Andrew Feenberg, in his article entitled "Reflections onto the Distance Learning Controversy" has clearly guided favor for the online education as one of the pioneers of such program. His admiration for the reason of the program is so conspicuous when he said that "the virtual school room was a location of intense thoughtful and human interaction" (A. Feenberg). I am personally in favor of chasing distant education, understanding that such procedure can help a allotment non-traditional students. It perhaps likely that "intense thoughtful and human interaction", as Feenberg asserted, can happen in online education. This is so because intelligent and intelligent students can be found any place additional in the world, despite of their nationality and age, as well as teachers. Ifurthermore agree that such kind of students can be shaped by online education but like customary classroom discovering, the case is relative. I said so because learning depends on how eager and dedicated students are.(Holzberg 1995)

For Feenberg to say that "the value of these online discussions surpasses any thing I have been adept to stimulate in my face-to-face" is something I would have to powerfully disagree with. Feenberg pronounced of his physical experience as an online teacher. The bias here is that not all educators find the identical thing. Linda Sweeney, in her item deserving "Guidelines for Being a Good Online scholar" expressed her annoyance in having studentswith awful discovering habits who are to be kept reminded of their schedules. The obvious component here is attitude. One difficulty with online learning is the mind-set of instructors, students, and managers. The quality of learning counts on how the parties involved act towards online learning and how much importance do they place on the program. As one Professor stated, "The students' hobby, motivation, doubting, and interaction must be on exhibit during the education process". As with the traditional classroom lectures, pupils and educators interaction is crucial in the education process. The personal exchange of data and views are suggestions that both parties are involved on what they are considering ...