Discuss the Statement Made By Lord Denning Which Concerns the Perceived Threat That Europe Was Undermining the Sovereignty of the UK Parliament



Discuss the Statement Made By Lord Denning Which Concerns the Perceived Threat That Europe Was Undermining the Sovereignty of the UK Parliament

Introduction

British legal system regulates not a constitutional document, but a set of legally binding rules of customary law and customs and practice constitutional. The statement by the Lord Denning, which concerns that the Europe was undermining the sovereignty of the UK Parliament in terms of a tidal wave bringing down sea walls and flowing inland over fields and houses.

Parliament supremacy is a controversial concept, which disputes about its desirability and nature. According to some analyst, the parliament sovereignty is being compromised through the codification of the instruction. The desirability of the sovereignty arguments suggests that the codification hampers the flexibility and strengthens the parliament. However, other believe that the supremacy of the parliament is the major barrier to the existence of a codified constitution, requisite to its unique riles and regulatory requirements. They believe that a codified system will be incompatible with the constitution of parliamentary sovereignty. The development of parliament supremacy emerged from the English civil war. Since then, it expanded and remained a dominant theme in British politics. The MP's which represent the constitutional via representative democracy are handed over the powers to assess, reject or pass legislations.

Parliamentary sovereignty is a thought in constitutional law that realizes to some parliamentary democracies. Under parliamentary sovereignty, a legislative body has absolute sovereignty, meaning it is greatest to all other central social family members' institutions. Moreover, it implies that the legislature can modification or repeal any beforehand legislation.

Discussion

As per the definition put lined by the House of Lords in 2001, the UK has a constitution, by virtue of the fact that the government operates on the laws of the land. Yet, there is a heated debate, both academic and cultural, about the nature of the political constitution. Some pints declare the ancient origins of the nation's political system and custom. These customs do not provide as great extent of consistency between parliament supremacy and the codification of the constitution. The lack of constitutionalism and the promotion of these laws are the possible factors, which did not assign significance to the codification of the British law. Many analysts look at the events that accommodated the political values and outlook of the British people in relation to the tradition over novelty. However, it is essential to keep the political history of Britain in mind when analyzing the British political thought. By doing so, one sees the British political culture as a crucial factor in facilitating the prevalence and function of non codified sanction.

It can be argued that in the presence of a codified system, the court will have the power to alter the law and decisions. Moreover, a codified system will help increasing the power of the judiciary, since it will have a written manuscript to refer to the ...