Difference Between a Political Rebel and Religious Rebel

Introduction

The effectiveness of both activists and their communal movements depends on a wide kind of skills, adeptness, character maturity and experience. Here, though, we expressly recognise four distinct functions that movement activists and their organizations need to play skillfully to be most successful: civilian, Rebel, communal Change agency, and Reformer. Moreover, these functions need to be played simultaneously, even though there are aspects of each that are at odds to the others. This needs a fair allowance of maturity and self - understanding. Of course, at any given period of time, one or two of these roles may be emphasized. How these functions are performed - and how well we realise and support others who are emphasizing roles distinct from the omes we are emphasizing - has a tremendous effect on the outcome of a communal movement. These four functions can be played in ways that are either effective or ineffective. Row well activists and their organizations play these functions strongly sway the degree of achievement or malfunction of the movement.

 

Difference between a Political Rebel and Religious Rebel

1. Citizen. Activists need to be solid Citizens, if they are to be acceptable to the general population, and be perceived as legitimate sources of information. Since the key to a successful social movement is to win over an increasing majority of the public, over time. The general population must be willing to listen to the movement's message. Therefore, the movement and its activists need to not only a message that the population is ready to hear, but also legitimacy, so the public is willing to listen in the first place.

Movement activists and the movement itself need to be grounded in the basic fundamental values and sensibilities of the society - such as democracy, freedom, and justice. The activists' culture and methods must also have the respect of the ordinary citizen. And the movement's analysis and activities need to be expressed through the symbols and traditions of the culture. The black civil rights, movement, for example, advocated basic principles that the nation stood for, even though they were not practiced in the South. The movement focused on principles of democracy, such as the right to vote and eat in restaurants. It was grounded in the Christian church and often led by such legitimate figures as ordained clergy, with activists wearing their Sunday—best clothes to demonstrations. Neither can social movements be violent and expect to win over the public, since only the government has the legitimate right to do political violence in our society.

2. Rebel. Activists, as rebel, shout “no to violations of principles, values, and sensibilities of the society and humanity, at times when the general population is not aware of these problems. At the beginning, this means challenging present conditions and policies, including using extra— parliamentary means, such as nonviolent direct action, mass rallies and demonstrations, boycotts, blockades, leaflets, declarations, symbolic actions, and noncooperation. Rebels need to call public attention to the problem and put ...