Research on teacher effectiveness has progressed through three distinct stages, mirroring data accessibility and appearing empirical approaches. Initial studies relied on cross sectional data aggregated at the level of schools or even school districts. This approach associated mean school check tallies to aggregate measures of educator proficiency. Most explicit measures of educator qualifications like experience and education had little effect on scholar achievement. In compare, implicit assesses of educator quality (i.e., the average presentation of one-by-one educators) differed significantly over teachers. These studies lacked controls for the former accomplishment of students attending distinct assemblies of schools. If localities allotted educators with more powerful credentials to schools with better prepared scholars, then the approximated return to teacher credentials would be overstated.
Analysis
Q1: Relationship between students' math achievement and teachers' experience and their salary
To find out that is there any relationship between this two variable, Chi-square test has been performed.
Ho: there is a relation between these two variable
H1: there is not any relation between these to variable and these two variables are independent
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
1.423E3a
1302
.011
Likelihood Ratio
561.750
1302
1.000
Linear-by-Linear Association
19.172
1
.000
N of Valid Cases
137
a. 1410 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The smallest anticipated enumerate is .01.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Asymp. Std. Errora
Approx. Tb
Approx. Sig.
Interval by Interval
Pearson's R
.375
.080
4.707
.000c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Spearman Correlation
.361
.079
4.504
.000c
N of Valid Cases
137
a. Not presuming the null hypothesis.
b. Uvocalise the asymptotic benchmark error presuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
As it can be seen the p value in this case is less than leveled significance which is 0.05. Hence it can be concluded that these two variables are independent and there is not any relation between these two variables.
What is the best predictor (pick one!) to explain students' math achievement scores?
To find out the answer, scatter plot and correlation coefficient value can be used.
Scatter plot
Scatter plots are alike to line graphs in that they use horizontal and upright axes to contrive facts and figures points. However, they have a very exact purpose. Scatter plots show how much one variable is affected by another. The connection between two variables is called their correlation.
Scatter plots generally comprise of a large body of data. The nearer the data points arrive when contrived to making a directly line, the higher the correlation between the two variables, or the more powerful the relationship.
If the data points make a directly line going from the origin out to high x- and y-values, then the variables are said to have a affirmative correlation. If the line moves from a high-value on the y-axis down to a high-value on the x-axis, the variables have a contradictory correlation.
From above scatter plot it can be seen that there is much more strong relation between salary and student math score than math score and teacher experience.
Correlations
The association between two variables reflects the degree to which the variables are related. The most widespread measure of association is the Pearson Product instant association (called Pearson's correlation for short). When measured in a population the Pearson Product Moment correlation is ...