Descriptions of democratic system pursue a standard model, a symbol of a secure and recognized philosophy. Frequently, the description alienates the chronological principle, and the arrangement of contemporary democracies. The chronological principle is generally Athenian democratic state, but there is no real link among olden and contemporary democratic state. In spite of the uncertainty and difference concerning the character of democratic system showed by the abovementioned, the areas of conformity present a potential groundwork and starting point for a more consequential idea of democratic state. Democracy is a premise of regime where the rule reveals the strength and determination of the greater part as decided by direct voting or chosen legislative bodies (Ranney & Kendall, 1951). This paper will address the critiques of democracy as they relate with the governance and public policy.
Discussion
Critiques of Democracy in Light of Few Scholars
Characteristically, the legality of a democratic system starts with the acceptance of a constitution, which sets up the essential laws, main beliefs, responsibilities, and powers of the administration and some set of constitutional privileges for individuals next to those of the administration. The facts of rights makes attempt to look after individuals from the impulses of a democratic mainstream, a conception formed as republicanism in the defeat of monarchism.
Beard (1993) asserted that the Framers of the Constitution were paying attention more in promoting their personal financial interests as compare to generate a truly delegate government. The management they formed was anti-democratic, created with the wellbeing of possessors of securities in mindset, not those of the populace as a whole. Many of the Framers did, indeed, stand to gain from the institution of a government that could increase profits to subsidize its individual liability, but following age groups of historians have indicated towards a number of faults ...