CRITICAL RESPONSE

“Critical response to the Code of Ethics and Will's column”



“Critical response to the Code of Ethics and Will's column”

Introduction

To be able to conduct a critical analysis of any literature, event or instance, it is essential to keep into mind three things. First being the credibility of the source, second the logic being what is presented, and finally the emotions associated with the message. Considering all three elements together can allow an effective and practical, critical analysis of the literature. The credibility of the author plays a pivotal role when providing a critical respond about the column written by George F Will.

George F Will

The left reactionary ideology shared by many Democrats, holds that individual rights should be repealed them uncomfortable to wear (like the secret ballot in union elections), that business failures, such as General Motors, should be pursued and that errors and outdated, as the "Fairness Doctrine" should be reimplanted. This last proposal as Orwellian name was employed at the time to eradicate the political debate in the media.

Since the progressive ideology has been less competitive in radio that the U.S. auto industry against foreign competitors, the leftists has defended intellectual protectionism remove ideological rivals. Until the Reagan administration finally loaded it, the doctrine required broadcasters to devote a "reasonable" time to present "fair" "all" points of view on any issue "controversial" to be debated. Of course it was the government who decided the meaning of the words that appear in quotation marks.

To justify the initiation of government regulation of radio content in 1927, the government used the excuse that broadcast frequencies were scarce. Thus, in 1928 and 1929, while the Republicans controlled Washington, warned a New York radio station owned by the Socialist Party, that had to show "due respect" the opinions of others, while prevented Chicago Federation of Labor to acquire a string, as this was against plurality. In 1939, when Democrats were in power, the government conditioned renewal of broadcasting licenses to stop criticizing Roosevelt.

In 1969, the Supreme Court declared constitutional the "Fairness Doctrine" probably because he did not know the use of it the Kennedy administration. As acknowledged by an official: "Our strategy was to use the Fairness Doctrine to challenge and humiliate the right-wing broadcasters, hoping that the insults were so burdensome to desist from continuing with their activities." Richard Nixon continued with this practice in 1973, left the Supreme Judge William Douglas, ...