CRIMINAL COURT CASE

Criminal Court Case

Abstract

The sixth amendment to the “United States Constitution” assurances criminal defendants the right to be endeavoured by an impartial jury of gazes and the inquiry of what constitutes an “impartial” committee has generated constitutional controversies in the last several decades as the community of the United States became more “ethnically” and “racially diverse”.

Criminal Court Case

The American affirmation of self-reliance, in writing in 1776, states all men are conceived equal. Shamefully, the United States of America did not heal all men identically when it was born that year. White men owned African Americans as slaves, compelling them to work on plantations to make the white men wealthy.

The United States lastly barred slavery with the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865. Prejudice beside African Americans lingered high, however, in the former slave states.

There was disquiet that these states would distinguish against newly unchained slaves by treating them differently under the law. To avoid that, the United States implemented the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868. The Equal defence Clause is an important part of the Fourteenth Amendment. It states states may not refute anyone "the identical protection of the laws." This means states should request their laws equally to all citizens. In Strauder v. West Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court had to conclude if a regulation that prevented African Americans from assisting on committees violated the identical Protection Clause.

White Men Only

Taylor Strauder was an African American who was ascribed with killing in Ohio shire, West Virginia, on 20 October 1874. A West Virginia law said only white men could serve as jurors (Guinther, 1988). Strauder did not believe he could get a fair trial in a state that did not allow African Americans to assist on juries. In detail, he considered West Virginia's law contravened the Equal defence Clause ...