Globalizing the Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES
Table of Contents
Introduction to the Case Study4
Background of the Study4
Statement of the problem4
Research Aims and Objectives5
Structure of the rest of the Report5
Case Brief7
About the Company7
SWOT Analysis7
Strengths7
Weaknesses7
Opportunities8
Threats8
Description of the problem8
Risk Management9
Currency Devaluations9
Regulatory Environment10
Problem Statement, Plan of Analysis11
Statement of the problems in the case11
Relevant Literature Review12
Cost of Capital12
Factors affecting Cost of Capital for MNCs12
Size of Company13
Access to Global Capital Markets13
International diversification13
Exchange Rate Exposure14
Country Risk14
Weighted Average Cost of Capital15
Capital Asset Pricing Model15
Formula16
Assumptions16
International Capital Asset Pricing Model16
ICAPM Formula17
Risks17
Firm Specific risk17
Systematic Risk18
Foreign Currency Exposure18
Translation Exposure19
Transaction Exposure19
Economic Exposure20
Empirical Studies20
Cost of Capital and MNCs21
Exchange Rate Exposure and MNCs22
Proposed Plan of Analysis23
Sources of Data23
Analysis and Findings24
An Assessment of the Current position24
Valuation of Lal Pir Project, Pakistan25
Valuation of US Company27
Proposed Solution to Problem28
Integrated Assessment of the Analysis28
Adjusted Cost of Capital and Probabilities of Real Events in Pakistan28
Discount Rate Adjustment: USA v/s Pakistan28
Recommendations34
Proposed Plan of Action34
Limitations of the Study, Scope for further research34
Application of the Learning To Another Organization In Any Industry38
References41
Appendix43
Financial Ratios43
Case Study: Globalizing Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting at AES
Introduction to the Case Study
Background of the Study
AES is a global power company with electricity generation and distribution operations spread across 28 countries on five continents. The company has undergone major expansion in a relatively short spam of time and has foreign subsidiaries in almost 28 counties. Over the years, the company has grown in a way that majority of its revenue was being generated from its units across the world out of which one third is generated from South American operations alone. On one side, it has resulted in phenomenal growth. On the other hand, the management failed to introduce superior methods for dealing all the financial matters and continued to follow a standard approach across all its projects irrespective of its locations and relevant risks. The company could not sustain the environment for a long period of time. Going international exposed the company to exchange rate fluctuations. This had an unfavorable effect on its debt servicing capacity. At the same time, its foreign subsidiaries also witnessed adverse change in regulatory environment in the host country which was mainly aimed to promote the interest of locally generated assets. Apart from this, decline of commodity prices globally further deteriorated the situation for the company. As a result of these incidents, the share prices of the company came falling from $75 to $1 which is quite a drastic fell.
Statement of the problem
The case titled “Globalizing Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting” at AES is essentially relates to difficulties faced by a company which has gone global and now faces the complexities of situations which put forward the demand for superior level of financial models to reassess the cost of capital. Initially, the company has transferred the domestic model to all its foreign subsidiaries. Subsequently, authorities realized that presence of diverse risks at varying levels that are often unique to geographic locations cannot be assessed by a standard valuation model and therefore, a new ...