Coordination leads to better team performance due to frequent communication and shared cognition within teams
by
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER # 4: RESULTS1
Introduction1
Questionnaire Analysis1
Team shared cognition5
Team Communication8
Team Coordination11
Regression Analysis15
Regression Analysis among shared cognition, communication and coordination18
Regression Analysis among shared cognition, communication and team performance21
Correlation Analysis24
Hypothesis Testing26
Factor analysis30
Summary33
CHAPTER # 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS34
Comparison of present research finding with previous research work34
Conclusion42
Limitations and Directions for Future Research43
REFERENCES46
APPENDIX50
Questionnaire50
Team Performance50
Team shared cognition51
Team Communication53
Team Coordination55
CHAPTER # 4: RESULTS
Introduction
This research study is conducted to examine the processes shared cognition and communication which teams use to coordinate and what the ultimate impact of coordination on team performance. The quantitative research method is used to the research data. The quantitative research method provides statistical evidence for the expected presumption that shared cognition and communication and coordination within teams promoted a high degree of coordination team performance enhanced. This chapter presents the findings of questionnaire survey. The respondent's responses were analyzed by using descriptive statistics technique of frequency analysis. To examine the strength of relationship among the duration of cooperation between team members, shared cognition, communication, coordination and team performance the inferential statistics techniques of chi square, correlation and regression analysis were carried out and presented in this chapter.
Questionnaire Analysis
The questionnaire survey is conducted with the team members of outpatient departments of hospital. The aim of this questionnaire survey is to collect the perception of outpatient departments' team members about the team work and coordination. The section below presents the analysis of questionnaire survey.
Team Performance
I think that the solution generated by the group was better than one I could have developed personally.
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
SD
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
D
4
4.0
4.0
5.0
N
21
21.0
21.0
26.0
A
46
46.0
46.0
72.0
SA
28
28.0
28.0
100.0
Total
100
100.0
100.0
The above table presents the findings of “I think that the solution generated by the group was better than one I could have developed personally”, the responses were collected by using five point likert scale. From the above table it can be observed that there were 28 percent of the respondents who strongly agree that they think the solution generated by the group was better than one they could have developed personally. There were 46 percent of the respondents who agree that they think the solution generated by the group was better than one they could have developed personally. In response to the asked statement 21 neutral responses were recorded in the above table. There were only 1 respondent who strongly disagree that they think the solution generated by the group was better than one they could have developed personally.
I would feel uncomfortable defending the group's decision.
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
D
2
2.0
2.0
2.0
N
19
19.0
19.0
21.0
A
45
45.0
45.0
66.0
SA
34
34.0
34.0
100.0
Total
100
100.0
100.0
The above table presents the findings of “I would feel uncomfortable defending the group's decision”, the responses were collected by using five point likert scale. From the above table it can be observed that there were 34 percent of the respondents who strongly agree that they would feel uncomfortable defending the group's decision. There were 45 percent of the respondents who agree that they would feel uncomfortable defending the group's decision. In response to the asked statement 19 neutral responses were recorded in the above ...