COMPARISON ESSAY

Comparison between Boss

This is a comparison essay between bosship styles. This essay will be highlighting and discussing on comparison between boss in terms of their personality traits and attributes and how they have become a leader. Becoming a boss mainly requires experience and smartness. (Hill, 84)

However, the term 'boss' means different things to different people. Ther are certainly two types of bosses that everyone who has entered into a professional life has faced. One type of a boss who will pamper, care take, integrate and involve an employee in all of the activities. The other type of boss is the one who leaves everything on an employee to face and self-learn in terms of how to get through any upcoming challenge.

Gandhi led effectively since he was dissimilar to other Indian fundamentals; Gandhi's boss or leadership was amongst right for freedom of India which was eventually successful; Roosevelt led successfully because he didn't buy into the ''rugged individualism'' that so many of his peers thought was the only defence against totalitarianism; Bill Gates led successfully because he didn't believe that there was only one ''environment''; while Martin Luther King led successfully because rather than listen to colleagues who advocated militancy, he made people believe in a dream. (Bandura, 191)

It would appear that the answer to this lies in the well-intentioned but mistaken belief that models are as suited to leadership as they are to management. Unlike management, leadership starts with the leader. His or her character and values are the foundations from which he or she can, with integrity and honesty, make decisions, exercise discretion and take action. Bosses are neither right nor wrong. They are, when effective, influential and persuasive, and they create the environment in which their decisions work. They work because, believing in their leaders, those who follow them make sure that they work. (Bordin, 252)

Who skilled Bill Gates to be so overwhelmingly aggressive, or Sir John Harvey-Jones to be so accountable, or Ricardo Semler to be so airy-fairy, or Richard Branson to be so audacious?

If these bosses referred to earlier in this essay have anything in common, it is that each acted with integrity. Each of them truly believed in what they said and did, even though those beliefs were, in many cases, fundamentally different from the beliefs of others, including those of other successful leaders. Moreover, their beliefs and values were reflected in their ...