Base on my qualification I realized that I can be good in teaching. a good teacher should have the following qualification:
Good teachers have a sense of purpose.
You can't be good in a generic sense; you have to be good for something. As a teacher, this entails that you understand what your students anticipate, and you make designs to rendezvous those expectations. You, too, have anticipations about what occurs in your school room, founded on the goals you're seeking to achieve. If you desire to arrange your students for paid work, you anticipate punctuality and good attendance. If you educate a GED class, you spend time interpreting the format of the check and assisting students to improve their test-taking skills. And if you desire your students to become better, more engaged readers, you permit time for reading and provide get access to books.
Good teachers have anticipations of achievement for all students.
This is the large paradox of teaching. If we groundwork our self-evaluation solely on the achievement of our students, we'll be disappointed. At all grades, but particularly in mature individual learning, there are easily too numerous components in students'lives for a teacher to be adept to assurance achievement to all. At the identical time, if we stop on our students, taking up a fatalistic, "it's out of my hands" mind-set, students will sense our need of firm promise and melody out. The joyous intermediate can be accomplished with a straightforward question: Did I manage everything that I could in this class, this time, to rendezvous the desires of all my students, presuming that entire achievement was possible? As long as you can response in the affirmative, you're conceiving a weather for success.
Good teachers understand how to reside with ambiguity.