ATACMS solid rocket failure came because of the need for the production of information technology, poor commitment to imagine a deal to use the material (graphite) and failure to achieve best practice construction and development of new products. According to the GAO Report, 2002 "to bring about any efforts to develop a new product on its hinges with the right information at the right time" In particular, information about that product itself is stable early in the program helps familiarize conclusions about when to increase considerably investment and reduces the risk of excessively itself changes that may result from unknown after the initial construction begins. This information comes in the structure made drawings of technology to transition from circuit to circuit integration demonstration phase of product development. Best practices suggest that is not less than 90 per cent of the hundreds of drawings for a product to be completed before the conclusion of added bring the assets. "(GAO report of July 202) in accordance with the ATACMS this has not been used as conceive of graphite was changed to accommodate the bottom of the form without proper technical support. This is in addition, the report shows that a prototype of such a scheme had not been verified ex-real output, therefore stopping the difficulties with the graphite coating from the query, and much needed changes.
In line to prevent a repetition of this difficulty MO desire to take a couple of best practices for the conclusion of the GAO report, July 2002. First, they need to create the structure of evolutionary development is limited to benefit themselves and the construction of information that wants to be caught. This structure will, in turn, limit yourself to one new spores develop products for the needy clever expertise to conceive, or construction ...