BARNES' VIEWS ON PSYCHOTHERAPY

Barnes' Views On Psychotherapy

Barnes' Views On Psychotherapy

I've changed that title for this essay not only because I think Pask participates in the conversation of mankind as the voice of poetry and the voice of science and the voice of practical activity, not only because I think his theory participates In a discussion of both art and science, but also because I think his work would contribute to the conversation of psychotherapy to make. Moreover, civilizing votes needed to be heard as distinctive and differentiated voices in a conversation of psychotherapy and psychotherapy is to hear and be heard in practical, scientific and poetic voice in the conversation of mankind. Difficult things that Pask was that each voice conversation is open, as Oakeshott (1991, p. 492) put it, "an exclusive concern with his own statement, which can result in the identification of a conversation with himself and his speaking as if only to themselves speak. And when this happens, barbarism can be seen to have supervened.

My first meeting with Gordon Pask was during dinner at Holmenkollen Park Hotel in Oslo, January 1992, the day before the seminar was to lead, assisted by Elizabeth Pask, for the few leaders Norsk Hydro [1]. Among the many issues that he and I bantered about was, of course, conversation. In passing I asked him if he was familiar with the wonderful essay by Michael Oakeshott called "voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind". Oakeshott (1991, p. 493) wrote that every vote - science, practical activities, and poetry - in its participation in talks "playful learning, learn to understand themselves and recognize themselves as conversationally voice among the voices.

For her voice, I think psychotherapy has to respect the other branches of the ruling as a context for private pain deserve to be heard, ...