I'm not the only one to notice the New York Times' baffling conclusion to reconsider Lee Siegel's new publication Barbarians at the Gate. Both times, furthermore, the allotment was granted to reviewers who were apparently predisposed to distributing Siegel's hostility to all things online and favorable in their expectation in the direction of the scribe himself.
Ethical Issue: Barbarians at the Gate
These points to two matters that the Siegel reconsiders increase, actually. The first is mostly exact to the Times itself, and its long-standing endeavours to choreograph the dialogues of the ...