The article under review is “(Key writing challenges of practice-based doctorates)” by Caroline San Miguel and Cynthia D. Nelson, published in Journal of English for Academic PurposesVolume 6, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 71-86.
Research Problem
The mentioned article analyzes the complications of writing research at the academic/professional interface. It examines reviews of two literature by students of professional doctorate at an Australian university, conducting a study of their first language, English, on the issues originating from their fields of specialized exercise.
Purpose of the Study
In English for Academic Purposes term (EAP) and related fields, concern has been progressively developing in distinguishing and dealing the research writing needs of students undertaking postgraduate (Bourdieu, 1991). This article attempts to add to the knowledge domain supporting much research writing programs by studying the complexnesses of writing postgraduate research at the academic/professional user interface.
Author's Findings
In this article, they also found two professional doctorate students in the written work of the first language of writing practice on the basis of the major challenges facing, taking into account the views of discipline and evaluation of tags. Analysts review the three main aspects of the text: text with Kate focused on the negative score writers their workplace, professional roles and beliefs, but could not explain the specific investigation related to the hand, or broader issues of research framework and text structure; self mentioned in the text of Kate frequent and embarrassing, or cover up her own agency or narrow targeting colleagues and readers, and the use of literature that involves little more than Kate's words to show their work initiative lack of awareness, combined with some questionable sources. Although only two students read the text does not allow firm calls examination or summary of the discussion in this article have a larger corpus of data, many students ...