ARIZONA IMMIGRATION LAW

Arizona Immigration Law

Thesis Outline

Introduction

Analysis

The Law

Current Scenario

Impact

Conclusion

Arizona Immigration Law

Thesis statement

Immigration has habitually been a part of the United states.

Introduction

The new Arizona regulation needs immigrants to convey their alien registration articles at all times and needs police to question persons if there is cause to suppose they are in the United states illegally. My opinion on the Arizona immigration law is that it's not a very good idea, because I believe it will bring about a lot of issues in the world. It could furthermore be a good thing too. When things like this come about I think people should look at it through all points of view.

Analysis

The new Arizona immigration regulation was passed on Monday September 20, 2010 that is going to “stop” illegal immigration. The immigration law had people that agreed and disagreed from all over the world. It is also a tough situation for some people because it's very controversial and people don't want to be wrong or right. They are stopping people who look suspicious and seeing if they are legal or illegal (Brown, 45-111).

There was almost 2,000 persons accumulated at a rally to support the new immigration regulation in Arizona. Hundreds of motorcycle riders kicked off the rally and the people were carrying signs that said “What part of illegal don't they understand?” There are many people who think that Arizona is doing the thing that “America” should be doing, which is protecting Arizona from illegal immigrants. The one who said this, though, would be John Anderson who came from Illinois to go to the rally (Handlin, 33-111).

Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona signed the nation's toughest bill on illegal immigration into law in April 2010. Its aim is to recognise, prosecute and deport illicit immigrants. The Arizona regulation, endangered to destabilise basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between policeman and our groups that is so vital to holding us safe (Daniels, 55-121). The law, which proponents and critics alike said was the broadest and strictest immigration assess in generations, would make the malfunction to convey immigration articles a crime and give the policeman broad power to detain any person supposed of being in the homeland illegally. Opponents have called it an open invitation for harassment and discrimination against Hispanics despite of their citizenship status. (www.washingtonexaminer.com)

Pinhabitant Obama is holding up the law as a prime demonstration of state authorities' "irresponsibility" on the issue—and therefore a key cause to hasten up government immigration reform. The leader of Mexico is angry, protesters have smeared swastikas made out of refried beans on the Arizona dwelling and council structures' glass doorways, and civil privileges activists condemn the regulation as a assault to legal rights and an invitation to racial profiling (blog.heritage.org)

The Law

The regulation needs policemanman to ask for immigration papers from any person who they have a "reasonable suspicion" might be in the homeland illegally. Law-enforcement agents are furthermore empowered to detain anyone ...