ANALYZE AND COMPARE FINANCIAL STATEMENT

Analyze And Compare Financial Statement

Analyze And Compare Financial Statement

Company Overview

According to its corporate annals webpage, FedEx was the brainchild of FrederickW. Smith (http://www.fedex.com/us/about/today/history). In 1971, Smith bought the commanding interest in the Arkansas Aviation Sales Company. Today, FedEx has a broad array of products and services to offer the buyer and business clients. They include bundle and wrapper services, agency and publish services (FedEx/Kinkos), freight services, and expedited services.

UPS began to provide air service deliveries in 1929 through personal airlines. However, due to the large despondency, air service deliveries stopped that identical year. In 1953, UPS begun providing two-day service to most metropolitan localitys. Today, UPS has evolved into a 36 billion dollar company. They offer a broad kind of goods and services which they also offer to buyers and businesses. These include air and engine cargo, UPS Capital economic services, conferring services and expert services

Cash Flow declaration for UPS and FEDEX

FedEx had some localities that increased a flag such as deferred earnings levies and other non-cash items. In 2003 FedEx had 329 million, in 2004 contradictory (8), and in 2005 63 million this is due to a levy settlement assertion received in 2004. "Our productive levy rate was 37.4% in 2005, 36.5% in 2004, and 38.0% in 2003. The 37.4% productive tax rate in 2005 was favorably impacted ($12 million levy advantage or $0.04 per weak share) by the onetime decrease of a valuation allowance on foreign tax credits originating from certain of our worldwide procedures as a outcome of the route of the American occupations Creation Act of 2004 and by a smaller effective state levy rate"(FedEx p.39).

"In February 2005, the Sixth Circuit Court of demands reaffirmed the favorable ruling from the U.S. District Court in Memphis considering the levy remedy of jet motor upkeep charges, previously obtained throughout the first quarter of 2004. The district court held that these costs were commonplace and essential business costs and correctly deductible in our income tax come backs. As a outcome of the locality Court ruling, FedEx recognized a one-time advantage of $26 million, snare of tax, or $0.08 per weak share in the first quarter of 2004, primarily related to the decrease of accruals and the recognition of interest acquired on allowances before paid to the IRS. These adjustments influenced both net interest expense ($30 million pre-tax) and income levy total cost ($7 million). FedEx expected to receive a refund payment of approximately $80 million (before income taxes of approximately $16 million) from the U.S. government in the first quarter of 2006, which is included in present receivables"(FedEx p.39). FedEx had an boost in interest total cost due the effect of scrounging for the acquisition of FedEx Kinko's and a former year favorable adjustment. Net interest total cost decreased somewhat in 2004 due to the counteract rises to interest total cost of the tax case described below. (FedEx, p. 39).

FedEx had $435 million of enterprise realignment costs throughout ...