Case study of three U.K airports Manchester, Heathrow and London City
By
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, it would give me great pleasure to show my gratitude to my professor, for his propositions, remarks, understanding and patience. It would also be an honour to express gratitude to my parents, my mother, my father, my sister and my brother for their endless support in my life and allowing me to make all my decisions. I would also like to take the opportunity to show appreciation to my co-workers for their expert cooperation on every occasion. I would also like to be grateful to the Department, managers of the university, instructors and students who have supported me throughout this research.
I certify that the work presented in the dissertation is my own unless referenced
I declare that the content presented in this thesis/dissertation is, in my understanding and opinion, original and has not been presented for scholarly assessment in the past, either completely or partly, for an academic degree at this educational institution or elsewhere. I would also like to admit that I have studied and understood the principles, prerequisites, processes and guidelines of the University regarding the higher academic degree research award and to my dissertation. I would also like to declare that I have abided by the University's principles, prerequisites, processes and guidelines.
Signed __________________ Date _________________
ABSTRACT
This research focused on the topic airport redesign for safety and security. The researcher took case study of three airports and found the possible security threats to the airport. The researcher chose this topic because airports are the main hub for air transportation. The researcher took three international airports i.e. Manchester, Heathrow and London City airport and discussed their security and safety perspectives. The researcher did extensive study and did mixed research for this study.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTII
DECLARATIONIII
ABSTRACTIV
LIST OF TABLESVIII
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION1
1.1Background of the study1
1.2Introduction2
1.3Problem statement2
1.4Research Aims and Objectives3
1.5Rationale of the Study3
1.6Research question4
1.7Outlay of the study4
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW6
2.1Airport Security6
2.2Trends in Security6
2.2.1The Ideal Service Level9
2.2.2The Desired Service Level9
2.2.3The Adequate Level9
2.2.4Zone of Tolerance9
2.2.5The Predicted Service Level10
2.3Post 9/11 security10
2.4Additional screening13
2.4.1Hand-Wand Inspection13
2.4.2Pat-Down Inspection14
2.4.3Carry-On Baggage15
2.5Airport security threats15
2.5.1Bombings15
2.5.2Airline hijacking15
2.5.3Smuggling16
2.6The concept of CPTED16
2.7Measures and parameters for maintaining airport security16
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY20
SECTION 1: RESEARCH METHODS AND RATIONALE20
3.1Research design20
3.2Strength and weakness of the mixed research21
3.2.1Strengths21
3.2.2Weaknesses22
3.3Justification of research tools22
SECTION II: RESEARCH METHODS APPLIED23
3.4Research tools utilized23
3.4.1Questionnaires23
3.4.2Secondary data collection24
3.5Likert scale24
3.6Questionnaire Design24
3.7Population25
3.8Data Sampling25
3.9Survey participants26
3.10Data Analysis26
SECTION III: RESEARCH METHOD CRITIQUE26
3.11Validity26
3.12Reliability27
CHAPTER 4: DATA ANALYSIS28
4.1Introduction28
4.2Analysis of the security initiatives at the selected airports28
4.2.1 Security initiatives at the Manchester airport28
4.2.2 Security initiatives at the Heathrow Airport29
4.2.3 Security initiatives at the London City Airport30
4.3Questionnaire analysis31
4.4Section 1: Possible Security Threats To Airport38
4.5Section 2: Measures Taken By Manchester, Heathrow and London City Airports to Improve Their Security41
4.6Section 3: Improve the Security44
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION49
REFERENCES52
APPENDICES58
Appendix A: Informed consent cover letter58
Appendix B: Questionnaire Survey60
Appendix B: Responses of the Questionnaire Survey64