The research paper focuses over the novel by Chester Himes “A rage in harlem” and analyze the main character John in terms of being straightforward, honest and a hard-working man.
Introduction
This novel is sort of a crunch into in Harlem. Himes wrote spectacularly successful entertainments, filled with gems of descriptive writing, plots that barely sidestep chaos, characters surreal, grotesque, comic, hip, Harlem recollected as a place that can make you laugh, cry, shudder. Instead of Redford and Newman, Himes populates his article with a cast of characters that are, well, characters.
After reading the novel I consider that there are some pretty interesting asides about what it was like to be very dark back then. However, this is not a preaching book. Himes just provides context.
In this book Himes is at his best in descriptions. Colors leap out of the text. Keep an eye out for a magnificent route that values the arrival of a train to recount the conditions of Harlem. (Himes 150)
Discussion
A Rage in Harlem is the first publication in Chester Hime's Coffin Ed Johnson Grave Digger Jones series. Surprisingly, the 2 detectives are secondary characters, but their "stage presence," so to talk, is immediate and impressionable. They are the only very dark detectives working 1960's Harlem and their reputations precede them while they go. Even the toughest hoodlums con men shrink and shiver in their midst. (Himes 159)
The Unassuming Ordinary Guy here is Jackson, who gets secured into a counterfeiting scam, and the next thing he understands he's running from the cops, while trying to get his money and his young female back, while furthermore figuring out just what the torment is going on. Also he has a twin male sibling who dresses up as a nun and deals permits to heaven, which is horrible and awesome.
I founded out this novel to be fast-paced and action-packed and racist and hella, hella violent. Like, graphic and gross. People get stabbed, shot, and beaten; they furthermore get in vehicle accidents and have unpleasant hurled in their faces. Everybody is a crook and a con man, and the one feminine character is absurd and probably bad and I can't conclude if I admired her or not. Additionally, Himes shares that hard-boiled detective writer gift for wholeheartedly truly unbelievable description. Is this a requirement of American thriller writers? First Hammett, then Chandler, now Himes - all these friends may be brutal and racist and misogynist, but my God can they writes a good description. (Eagleton 46)
I extracted that this book focuses on straightforward, honest, hard-working man, Jackson, who is conned out of his money in the first chapter. The con men are allegedly from the South and have recently begun this game with newfound gold. Jackson is in love with Imabelle, who is working for the con men...or is she? Jackson new employees his hassle, Goldie, a heroin junkie who dresses up like a nun to make some dough, to get his money and his ...