1. Explain Descartes' cosmological proof of God2. How does falsity arise for Descartes in Meditation Four?

1. Explain Descartes' cosmological proof of God

After Descartes realized that he can know with certainty that "I exist" is true, he continues to build on its basis of truth. The truth about the nature of God, the proof of the existence of God and the nature of physical objects are, in particular, after Descartes proves its existence. The main goal of Descartes in meditation was to develop a system that would lead him to the truth. He wanted to build a foundation on which all subsequent philosophical research can be built. It is important that his convictions were sound. If anyone of them at all in doubt, then he put the credibility of the whole structure of knowledge is in danger. We will discuss some of the themes of Descartes analysis after his epiphany existence. Throughout the essay, we will raise some concerns that is related to the conclusions of Descartes, "as well. In his second meditation, when Descartes pushes method doubt in full, a few truths to survive as they can not be questioned Descartes should know them. The first of these is that "I exist." The second truth, when Descartes asks: "What am I?" caught my attention. It is been found it strange that he feels the potential answers, asking whether he could doubt them. Test It seems strange, because one doubts the ability of something usually do not show that it is false. If it is not doubt that my hairy legs in a West Virginia University, does not mean that it is not? It was later, when Descartes paraphrases his response, and therefore the question of his, from the point of view, "that is inseparable from my nature, it is been realized that the issue was special. When he starts talking:" we now admit nothing, except what is necessary because, "we finally saw that seems a common question was really a question that is important for us. To check that the characteristic of what is necessary for some things, we just have to consistently imagine a thing without characteristics.

If we coherently imagine a unicorn without a horn on his forehead, then the horn would not be important to be a unicorn, because if it was, we could not imagine it. When Descartes claims to know: "we... just thinking being," what he says ...