[Name of the Writer]

[Name of the Institution]

[Subject]

[Date]

Torture on Criminals, Terrorists and Spy

Introduction

The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the torture for criminals, terrorists and spies. It is a general approach that criminals, terrorists and spies are being tortured against their criminal acts. Thus, this approach is widely spread all over the world. NO matter it's a developed country or underdeveloped country, criminals are being tortured all over. Many people claim that torturing the criminals is a good approach as it is helpful in saving the criminals from further crimes. On the other hand, some people believe that torturing the criminals is a negative approach and increases the negative aspect among criminals. The paper analyzes the torture for criminals, spies and terrorists.

Discussion

The human rights organization have brought it into observation that the torture committee should revise its policies and should not be involved in torture. The convention has been established in order to avoid the torture and implementations have been conducted to monitor this torture. Thus, these are the violations against the human rights which should be prevented. Thus, it can be said that there are different views of people in terms of the torture on the criminals and terrorists. The law and enforcement authorities claim that the terrorists are the inhuman; therefore, inhuman treatment is necessary with them (Edgerton, 906). The criminal law and enforcement officers justify this treatment of torture by claiming that this is the act which can help the terrorists from being the inhuman. These officers claim that the terrorist torture acts are the best ways which can prevent the terrorist attacks. On the other hand, different human rights authorities claim that terrorist torture is the worst act which can be performed by the law and enforcement officers. According to human rights commission, this act is against the human rights laws; therefore, necessary actions should be taken against this act. These actions should be on federal level and it should be assured that there will be no more torture on terrorists.

The use of torture has been widely increased in the prisons. The law and enforcement officials are using the torture approach for the criminals, spies and terrorists. One reason for this supranational regulatory arsenal and interior mirror is its significance: what underlies the prohibition is the recognition and defense of human dignity and its reception is a border, not a criminal theory, but rather in a State specific theory (Fernandez, 469). Thus the prohibition of torture-extended to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, is a rule in the plasticity of dignity or, better presented, and the latter is presented in what touches the treatment of people. This recent statement is of vital importance in the theory of law and more specifically in the rule of law: Dignitas often can further restricted as a principle or value, able per se to orient in one direction, although multiple or variable in its product policy, The direction of the task state power (Edgerton, 906). According to the United Nations ...