[Influence of Computer-Mediated Communication On Interaction]

by

Acknowledgement

I would take this opportunity to thank my research supervisor, family and friends for their support and guidance without which this research would not have been possible.

DECLARATION

I, [type your full first names and surname here], declare that the contents of this dissertation/thesis represent my own unaided work, and that the dissertation/thesis has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own opinions and not necessarily those of the University.

Signed __________________ Date _________________

Table of Contents

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION1

Background1

Problem Statement2

Hypothesis2

Theoretical Framework3

CHAPTER 02: LITERATURE REVIEW4

Theoretical Perspectives4

Reduced Social Cues, Anonymity, And Personal Intimacy6

Reduced Social Cues, Anonymity, And Group Identity7

Implications For Children And Adolescents8

Conceptual Overview10

Critical Commentary and Future Directions13

Clarifying The Terminology16

Social and cognitive components in CMC research20

Self-awareness22

Self-awareness and deindividuation effects24

Self-awareness and hyperpersonal communication25

Self-awareness and communal persona form of deindividuation consequences (SIDE)26

CHAPTER 03: METHODOLOGY28

Pilot study28

Method28

Participants, conceive, and procedure28

Experimental manipulations29

Public self-awareness measures29

Results30

Design and untested manipulations31

Participants and procedure32

CHAPTER 04: DISCUSSION35

Measures37

Private and public self-awareness37

Intimacy, task vs. communal orientation, formality, and politeness37

Attraction38

Group identification38

Results39

Manipulation checks39

Independence of observations39

Hypothesis checking and mail hoc results41

Analysis43

CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION47

REFERENCES49

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Background

Early perspectives on computer-mediated communication (CMC) proposed that the text-based and visually anonymous natural environment endemic to CMC needed the capability to consign wealthy communal information. Therefore, it was asserted that CMC inherently hindered interpersonal communication or even boosted the development of uninhibited impersonal interactions for example “flaming”.

More latest study has disputed this deterministic view. For demonstration, the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects (SIDE) suggests that the visually anonymous natural environment of CMC intensifies one's sensitivity to assembly and communal persona, and how an one-by-one actions in CMC counts on the salience of the individual's assembly persona and the norms of the assembly in which the one-by-one is communicating. In supplement, Walther discovered that, over time, CMC users acclimatized to the computer-mediated natural environment and evolved interpersonal connections alike to connections formed face-to-face, or that even passed their personalness in key ways. Finally, one-by-one character traits have been shown to leverage assembly conclusions in computer-mediated teams. These perspectives comprise a migration in CMC study away from technologically deterministic interpretations premised finely on the idea of deindividuation, and in the direction of a more complete concern of framework, communal, and cognitive components that more completely interpret individuals' mind-set and behaviors in this context.

Problem Statement

This evolution parallels communal psychological study in the last couple of decades that has recognised anonymity and the need of self-awareness as two of the most significant situation that may lead to the state of deindividuation. However, whereas comprehensive study has been dedicated to comprehending the consequences of anonymity in CMC, very couple of empirical investigations have analyzed the leverage of self-awareness in this context. Thus, this study suggests one-by-one self-awareness as a vital variable assisting to partially reconcile disparate perspectives on one-by-one behaviors inside CMC.

Hypothesis

H1a-b: persons with intensified personal self-awareness will brandish a larger grade of: (a) familiarity and (b) communal orientation (versus task orientation) than will persons without intensified personal self-awareness.

On the other hand, past study proposes that intensified public self-awareness will ...