Consequentialism

Consequentialism

Consequentialism theories have different elements and these elements considered as there are valid and invalid arguments in the Modus Tollens. There are moral constraints in the life of human beings that needed to be evaluated in the biconditional right action definition. There are arguments in the theory of Consequentialism as the arguments are the sequences of the elements in the statements. The right action in the Consequentialism stated by if-then statements as these will be two conditional definitions. There are valid and invalid arguments and therefore the result is accurate in the valid argument as the invalid arguments are the intuitively wrong acts performed by a person. The morally right action states that

If you help a needy person, then you will get inner satisfaction.

You help a needy person.

Therefore, you will get inner satisfaction.

These arguments is known as Modus arguments as there are two premises in conducting the right action and there will be no result of right action. However when the right act is conducted the person will get inner satisfaction. In the two arguments one premise is right and another is wrong as the first argument is right and the second argument is the consequence of the first argument.

Now further the argument is valid or not as the argument statements will be altered in this way as the morally wrong action states that

You will not get inner satisfaction.

If you help a needy person, then you will get inner satisfaction.

You didn't help a needy person.

In the real life scenario these arguments are not true and acceptable as there are numerous reasons for not helping the needy person at that moment may be you left money at home or you have spend all the money therefore you cannot provide money to the needy person. In logic there are ...