THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE NEEDS OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE NEEDS OF SOCIETY IN THEIR NARRATIVES

The Conflict between the Needs of the Individual and the Needs of Society in their Narratives



THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE NEEDS OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE NEEDS OF SOCIETY IN THEIR NARRATIVES

Introduction

Overall, balance between one-by-one privileges and good of humanity is key to finding thriving, joyous society. In general privileges of persons are more significant when and where they manage not encroach on privileges of other persons, but where they combine good of humanity should arrive first. The undertaking chased should be that which will most advantage society. Thus, when somebody actions out contrary to humanity, such as through robbery or killing, exactly violating another individual's privileges it is in concern of humanity to halt them. In that case, good of humanity should arrive before right of errant one-by-one to manage anything he jolly well pleases. Thus regulations are conceived as way of working out in those interactions who is right, who is incorrect, and how humanity should answer to those actions. (Bowering 1968:56)

We reside in humanity in which generally each one-by-one places themselves first. This should not be. I accept as factual it has to manage with mindset of people. Because most persons are spent with producing certain their own desires are contacted, outcome is that most of time desires of other ones are ignored. This makes our humanity one of large require and lack. If every individual were to halt focusing on their own desires and likes and started to gaze out-of-doors of themselves for those in larger require, desires of "individual" would disappear. Why would man voluntarily give his life in assault to keeps inhabits of other ones round him? I accept as factual it is because he sees larger picture. He identifies that as an one-by-one he can manage so much to assist humanity and to make world better place. Are not these kind of persons we call heroes? The reality is that we can all be hero's everyday by putting other ones ahead of ourselves. It is much more tough to conceive thriving and wholesome humanity than to rendezvous desires of one one-by-one, and because of this I accept as factual desires of humanity are more important. Sure there's middle ground....that's what humanity is. It's middle or rather widespread ground where persons arrive simultaneously and proceed corporately to complete what persons usually can't get finished alone. I don't believe your inquiry admits of an response, because it's not an either-or situation. Individuals are significant, not less than we believe so, and humanity is significant because it's cooperative aggregation of individuals. (Johnston 1987:45)

Discussion 

That's very Western, humanist Rousseauvian answer, of course. We grow up with notion that individual fulfillment, that famous "pursuit of happiness," is ultimate definition of good. We expect our society to be organized in such way as to allow us widest possible latitude for doing our own thing. Ahumanity which demands sore and non-consensual forfeitures from us is by delineation ...