Should Tobacco be ban all the public places

Introduction

Cigarette is one of the most well liked things used all over the world and fuming is a large-scale difficulty which raises anxiety in society about its influences on people's health. In latest years, as numerous researchers' researches show that smoking can be origin of a large number of serious hazards and numerous unsafe infections which can kill people rapidly. In alignment to eradicate the risk of smoking in public locations, numerous authorities are contemplating of banning fuming in public locations, it means it will be not allow to smoke in all surrounded spaces, workplaces encompassing bars, pubs and restaurants, but if or not is it appropriate for the government to command an individual's right to fumes in public places?. There are numerous contentions about the fuming ban principle in public locations of the governments. Two major contentions round it are carrying and resisting argument. This essay is going to discuss these two main arguments and also shows that which one is appropriate.

Background Information

Standing at the view of persons who contradict with the fuming ostracise principle, such as smokers, alcoholic beverage, tobacco or entertainment companies, it is contended that fuming ostracise in public places is going to affect and give negative influences on their flexibility and benefits. It is observed that this principle will decrease the tobacco, alcohol and amusement businesses' advantages which contribute a gigantic tax to the government. This contention comes from the spectacular decrease of beer sold in bars, pubs and restaurants. Researches mentioned that there is a important decline in total alcohol goods traded in bars, pubs and bistros recently. There are furthermore more and more numerous drinkers proceed out to taverns or bars after the ban because they want to go there for consuming, fuming and resting simultaneously, so after the bans they will find another locations where they can keep their custom of consuming and smoking at the same time rather than of going to bars, taverns or restaurants (BBC news). In addition, it was showed that the amount of cigarettes sold is decreasing since the smoking ban policy was issued; the major decrease comes from shops, bars, pubs and restaurants (Independent news, 207). Moreover, it is claimed that the smoking ban policy in public places will offers some negative effects on smokers.

Argument

Some findings noted that smoking ban policy is inappropriate which is denying people's right in choice and it means that people are losing their freedom. According to Simon Clark, director of smoking support group Forest, said:

“This is a double whammy and an pointless and illiberal part of legislation that refutes flexibility of alternative to millions of people”.

He also suggested that the government have no right to control smokers' right in smoking and force them to quit smoking by issuing a strict policy like that instead of noticing them about the risks of smoking can relate to some serious diseases (BBC news). Forest also argued that there is no clear link between serious diseases and passive ...