ETHICAL ISSUE

Ethical Issue (Prosecutors)

Ethical Issue (Prosecutors)

1. In to claim the husband with the misbehavior, driving under the influence (DUI, the officers requisite to have seen him driving previous to failing a soberness test. Though, in the real report, the officers affirmed that they adage him walking, but never in the vehicle. In the amended report, the officers said they saw him driving.

2. Officers Nixon and Rook altered events in the amended, and supervisor accepted, report that they gave to Prosecutor Ross Acute. The statement said that her husband driving while under the body of alcohol justified, and they arrested him on charges of vehicle.

3. "Claimant" obligations "of the point of view of" husband "faithfully, no damage," the police officer should protect him, and not change the facts to meet their own needs "3B of the future generations of individuals charged with drunk driving car "Fidelity Throughout history" cases, such as Article 3A As this precedent in the future how to set up individual should be considered in the same case, because a similar situation. all the civil rights and should be given the opportunity to be presumed without crime, especially when the police as a witness the start of the event was non-criminal use of "3C personnel Nixon and cars" true "as it is unclear whether there are staff in the agreement a second report on the forged documents to determine her husband . However, the report turned over to the original, unsigned, and not, and swapped out the report that the approval should be sent back to prison, "prosecutor Ross acute three-dimensional" Fidelity "Rose acute recognition of the Prosecutor, there are two different versions of the report that can completely change the outcome for her husband.

4. "Husband is sentenced, but instead of jail time has to do community ...