Different Accounts of the Natural State of Human Beings

Introduction

Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Locke formulated hypotheses on individual characters of humans and how mankind regulates itself. With the passage of time, governmental views on the political school of thought modified little by little. Regardless of their differences of opinion, Hobbes, Rousseau, and Locke, all turned out to be three of the most prestigious governmental philosophers in the world. Their thoughts and doctrines are scattered throughout the world shaping the foundation of many new administrations (Alistair, Pp: 34-40). These theorists realize that individuals formulate an understanding within their community, but have contradictory perspectives on what precisely the understanding is and how is it founded (Alistair, Pp: 34-40).

Hobbes, Rousseau, and Locke each formulated disagreeing interpretations of the understanding, but all established that some exemptions were given up for community's security and that the administration has clear obligations to its general public (Alistair, Pp: 34-40). Each scholar holds that before mankind came to regulate itself, they all lived in a natural state.

They intention to ponder on the natural state and the circumstances mankind was in before policy-making administration came to life, and what community may become if there was no administration. Hobbes, Rousseau, and Locke produced a radical idea of the natural state. They did not think administration has to be formed with the help of the Church, thus giving up the theory of divine right, where supremacy of the King came straight from God. Beginning from a fresh start, with no coordinated church, they required a concept to construct the community on (Alistair, Pp: 34-40).

Discussion

The basis of community started out with the original natural state. Hobbes's insight of the original natural state dwells on the matter pertaining to what would survive if there were no universal supremacy to perform and impose polices to restrict people. In this situation, the jungle law would dominate where there will be survival of the fittest. Mankind's wishes are greedy (Locke, Pp: 28-35). Since there are scarce resources, humanity is by nature bloodthirsty, unavoidably creating envy and disgust, which ultimately results in conflict. This continuous conflict is mankind's original natural state, according to Hobbes.

Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes

Mankind cannot be believed in the natural state, says Hobbes. Limitations should be put on sovereignty and unchallengeable human rights. Hobbes published during the period of the Civil War of England (Alistair, Pp: 34-40). His governmental perspectives were shaped by the conflict. Hobbes comprehended that by returning the sovereign the civil war would come to an end. In contrast, Locke thinks the original natural state is a state which consists of ideal independence where human beings act according to their motivation and capability to achieve. Humans have the freedom to put together his life in the way he prefers. Nevertheless no human being has the right to execute himself (Alistair, Pp: 34-40).

Political Philosophy of John Locke

Unlike Hobbes, Locke's concept of the state of nature has been interpreted by commentators in a variety of ways (Locke, Pp: ...