Critical Thinking Essay

Critical Thinking Essay

Introduction

Critical thinking is not a method to learn, but rather a cognitive process having alternating multidimensional phases of analysis and action phases. This complex process of high-level thinking is also based on rational thinking that is a creative problem solving while being sensitive to people and contexts. Finally, it is a recursive process and nonlinear by which a person forms a judgment on what to think or do in a situation precise. Critical thinking is the ability of a person to think rationally in order to make some decision. Critical thinking can be considered as the art that analyzes that evaluates the thinking of a person in order to improve it. A critical thinker is one who thinks about the problems and questions and plans them accurately and precisely (Vallano, 2008). A critical thinker also collects and measures the necessary information by making use of the abstract ideas in order to interpret them effectively. A critical thinker reaches the conclusions very quickly and finds the well-reasoned solutions, and makes them the test cons of standards and criteria. A critical thinker also has open mind thinking and finds the alternative solutions of the problems assess them and measures its assumptions and the implementations with their practical consequences (Shields, 2007).

Discussion

Critical thinking requires clarity, accuracy, fairness and evidence, as it tries to avoid the particular impressions. In this sense, is related to skepticism and the detection of fallacies. Through a process that involves critical thinking, using the knowledge and intelligence to achieve a reasonable and justified position on an issue. Among the steps, experts say there take the attitude of a critical thinker, to recognize and avoid cognitive biases, identify and characterize arguments, evaluate information sources and, finally, evaluate the arguments. Note that critical thinking involves no negative thinking or a predisposition to find flaws and faults. Nor try to change the mindset of the people or replace the feelings and emotions (Purnell, 2008). The goal of critical thinking is to avoid the social pressures that lead to the standardization and conformity. The critical thinker seeks to understand how to recognize and mitigate or avoid the various deceptions to which it is subjected in the everyday. Whereas Flag strategy mainly focuses to identify initial detection in the weakening of the patient's condition through the use of usual rates of patient's imperative signs and providing restrictions for risky, normal and critical readings and the ways through which to act if single or more than one readings appear more than mentioned range (Murphy, 2010).

Critical Thinking and Nursing Practice

It involves deliberate thought, aimed at achieving a goal

It is oriented to the patient, family and community needs

It is based on the principles of nursing process and scientific method

Constantly under re-evaluation, and striving to improve patients condition

Requires knowledge, skills and experience

Requires strategies to develop the full human potential (using individual resources) and make the most of the problems created by human nature.

It is guided by professional standards and ethical codes ...