CRITICAL REVIEW OF A PUBLISHED RESEARCH PAPER

Critical Review of a Published Research Paper

You can delete the highlighted area for reducing the paper length upto 750 words

Critical Review of a Published Research Paper

Introduction

Harrington et. al., (2005) in their article keeping warm and staying well, explore in to the nature, alleviation and relationship of fuel poverty to family health. A good deal of the investigation into fuel poverty that ensues from different combinations of fuel inefficiency and low income has delineated upon quantitative models. By means of qualitative interviews with members of household, data for the study was collected about the concern issues. It is suggested by the findings that there is a considerable variation between the outlooks of those in fuel poverty regarding staying warm, and their perceptions in relation to the connection between warmness and wellbeing. Fuel poverty oftentimes had extensive implications, bearing upon quality of life in multifaceted modes. Steps were taken by the respondents for alleviation of cold, but there was a variation in their strategies. Informational limitations in addition to cost constraints affected coping a great deal. Measures premeditated to lessen fuel poverty should keep in mind its broader social implication in the lives of household members.

Discussions & Analysis

In recent years, the fuel poverty has turn out to be a real social issue that binds the unique poor housing and poverty issues of modern comfort. Fuel poverty is a form of "double punishment". Harrington et. al., (2005) tries to explore the implication of fuel poverty, bringing the Warm Homes Project's qualitative data into play, a research that also took account of 4 structured interview surveys, held annually, of households that were fuel-poor and for the analysis of the impact of living in fuel poverty on health, a randomised controlled trial was undertaken. From 2000- 2003, surveys were done with a sample primarily enrolled in 2000. Into two groupings, fuel-poor ménages were divided at random, who obtained a personalized package of home upgrading in the summer season, before the survey held in the year 2002 or 2003.

An average of £727 was worth of the packages that range in between £0-3335. The package was comprised of loft insulation, draught exclusion, central heating, cavity wall insulation, heating controls and other actions as needed. An improvement was produced by them in ratings of Standard Assessment Procedure, which is a standardized quantification of heating effectiveness on a scale of 1-120. Knowledge of fuel poverty and its health outcomes of respondents were explored in this qualitative study, along with their means of getting by, and their responses to interventions in fuel poverty.

Methodology

Collection of data and its analysis were put through concomitantly, in cycles, with evolving matters dealt in succeeding interviews. Til it was turned over that new-fangled data was not being received, data collection was continued. This inductive strategy was intended to seem sensible of the circumstances without enforcing pre- existent outlooks (Patton 1987, p.n.d.) The interviews were carried out by four researchers, who processed the analysis as ...