Case Study

Case Study

Case Name

Pressure Vessel Manufacturer

Major Facts

The major of the study facts are based on selecting the best company to purchase of one pressure vessel. It also highlights the reason for which that company is chosen and from these companies which one of them meets their requirements at its best. Atomic Products Company was not enthusiastic in doing supplying the vessel. Similarly, Nuclear Vessel Company was interested in doing the business and doing a fair deal of business.

Major Problem

The major problem of the study are based on the fact what company best meets the specifications of the buying the pressure vessels? Is there any reason of conflict emerging in the company management and how can it be resolved? What role does conflict management play in this regard?

Possible Solutions

The possible solution of this case can be determined by the relations with the suppliers. The advantage of this can be since the behaviour of Atom Company was as if they were not interested in doing the deal of business therefore they were showing less interest in the business. It would be a better option to choose (Pruitt, 2003). Supply business involves two major elements. The first is to be comprehensive that it should cover the different elements involved in a solution. In this case we're talking about practice processes supported by information technology enablers and the development of organizational capabilities that will allow implementation and development of practices and information technology (Alper, Tjosvold, 2000). On the other hand, must be relevant, which means that the solutions are designed to provide strategic and economic value to the business, or in other words, that are aligned to business strategy. Both the management staff and management are very similar to any other aspect of our lives: not everything is as we want and there are conflicts. The way to achieve any goal is not to see how conflicts are avoided, the right way is to face front and solve any problems.

Culture is always relevant if one seeks to understand and resolve disputes. The solutions to conflicts generally appear in three layers. The top layer is the bone of contention. When it is a question of who gets what and this is how people see most often conflicts. We should tend to focus on that and seek to resolve the problem as well. The second level relates to communication (Pinkley, 2000). We believe that if we use sufficient communication skills and that we communicate about the litigation, we can resolve conflicts. These two views are very limited because they ignore the fact that there are symbolic aspects in how each of us prepares reports with the subject matter. Requirements of communication such as active listening and reframing derive from a particular set of assumptions on communications that the other party disagrees maybe not. The worldview and issues of culture and perception the type of symbolic domain are absolutely essential to include any type of deep conflict and are in fact the starting point of the ...